BETA
Check out the Understanding the Decision Guide page
Description: The Governor or designee should ensure that the TIP meets other state and federal requirements so that the TIP can be incorporated into the STIP and be in agreement with the state document. Both documents should be flexible enough to adjust to amendments.
There is information developed in prior key decisions that informs this step.
To consider the need to balance the program and meet other state/federal requirements in order to support the TIP for incorporation into the STIP.
Agreement by the state that the MTIP (Metropolitan TIP) is acceptable for incorporation into the STIP.
Partner Roles | ||
|---|---|---|
FHWA |
Advisor |
Ensures the incorporation of the TIP into the STIP meets all federal requirements |
MPO |
Observer (urban), No Role (rural) |
Observes the incorporation of the TIP into the STIP in accordance with federal requirements |
Resource Agency |
No Role |
No action on TIP incorporation in STIP. |
State DOT |
Decision Maker |
Recommends TIP to the Governor for incorporation into the STIP |
Process |
Integration Type |
Integration Description |
|---|---|---|
| Land Use and Smart Growth | None. | None. |
| Air Quality Conformity | None. | None. |
| Natural Environment and the IEF | None. | None. |
| Capital Improvement | None. | None. |
| Safety and Security | None. | None. |
| Human Environment | None. | None. |
| Economic Development | None. | None. |
| Greenhouse Gas | None. | None. |
Linkages to other Phases of Transportation Decision Making | |
|---|---|
None. |
|
Policy Questions |
|
|---|---|
Questions about purpose and roles |
No specific questions. |
Questions about stakeholders |
No specific questions. |
Questions about the transportation process supporting the decision |
Does the TIP meet federal requirements? |
Questions about other phases |
No specific questions. |
Questions about non-transportation sectors/processes |
No specific questions. |
Questions to Gather Stakeholder Interests |
|---|
None. |
Questions to Incorporate Stakeholder Interests |
|---|
None. |
Case Study Example(s): |
|---|
None. |
Supporting Data for the Key Decision |
|
|
|---|---|---|
From other phases of transportation decision making |
Long Range Planning |
No Specific Data | Programming |
No Specific Data |
Corridor Planning |
No Specific Data |
Environmental Review |
No Specific Data |
From other sectors and processes |
Land Use and Smart Growth |
No Specific Data | Air Quality Conformity |
No Specific Data |
Natural Environment and the IEF |
No Specific Data |
Capital Improvement |
No Specific Data |
Safety and Security |
No Specific Data |
Human Environment |
No Specific Data |
Economic Development |
No Specific Data |
Greenhouse Gas |
No Specific Data |
From the transportation technical process supporting this key decision |
Analysis comparing the TIP and the STIP. | |
Conformity analysis / Approval of conformity analysis by MPO. | ||
Analysis validating the TIP is consistent with the LRTP. | ||
From stakeholder collaboration |
Public input. | |
From public private partnership |
No Specific Data | |
Supporting Tools and Technology | |
|---|---|
None. | |
Key Decision Relationship to Other Topics | |
|---|---|
| None. |